I have 5.2.0.3, - just opened 11 different components (1 MOSFET) Attached Patterns with out a problem.

Like diptrace_en64_5.2.0.2.exe... makes total sense. At a minimum, the FULL version in any announcement, query,and all posts.

My thoughts - NOT needed. Dip-trace is totally proper for SCH / PCB production. No need for STEP files.

hmm..interesting --YES very interesting. Thank you !

Simple - Start NEW, configure ALL desired attributes and save as xxx. Example , 1 side, 4 layer, Smp xx - name as appropriate for later reference.
Later open desired reference file, make any entry, save with appropriate new name. Close, open saved last file.
Their is no need for DT more bloat ...

Not needed -
nonsense that requires additional SW development resources time/effort + SW bloat.
Be safe,
m

"and I see that I didn't do that for every pad as I should (was in a hurry)"
DipTrace has no options for this !
User Error -

"and I see that I didn't do that for every pad as I should (was in a hurry)"
DipTrace has no options for this !
Operator Error - future want

Comment suggesting "saw Ki-Cad is supported by Flux (https://www.flux.ai/p/pricing). Not sure if DIPTrace have a roadmap for this? Top "
The DipTrace developer team has no time to waste following others.

If the 'other' is so great , use it !

DipTrace developers need not follow others - it is ...

Rather general fluff and buff, void of detail;
Example long life - hours at what temperature
Show a ' Typical' mfg's DATA Specification Data Sheet
Thank you,
m