Still missing in v4...
It's unpleasant to ungroup, resize all the parts, perfectly align them all again, and re-group.
Search found 29 matches
- 07 Jun 2024, 03:24
- Forum: Forum Suggestions and Feature Requests
- Topic: Need ability to resize pattern elements
- Replies: 2
- Views: 32337
- 24 Apr 2024, 19:12
- Forum: DipTrace Schematic Capture
- Topic: BOM Updates?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6281
BOM Updates?
(1) Please add the ability to update the BOM with current settings, rather than re-created it each time! It forgets its settings, even reverts to Vector font and a HUGE size each time the app is restarted. It should choose a font size to match the width of a printed page in landscape mode. Then we c...
- 24 Apr 2024, 18:44
- Forum: DipTrace Schematic Capture
- Topic: Problem printing schematic
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16045
Re: Problem printing schematic
Printing is an undeveloped feature that could use more work.
Please add this to the feature request list.
Please add this to the feature request list.
- 24 Apr 2024, 18:41
- Forum: DipTrace Schematic Capture
- Topic: Extract a pattern from .eli component
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12531
Re: Extract a pattern from .eli component
When download from SnapEDA the pattern is included in the .eli file. How can I extract the pattern to edit? In the Pattern Editor: DipTraceCopyPatternFromComponent.jpg 1. Pattern > Insert from Another Library... 2. Choose Components from the Dropdown menu DipTraceCopyPatternFromComponent2.jpg Both ...
- 24 Apr 2024, 18:12
- Forum: DipTrace Schematic Capture
- Topic: More Text Colors!
- Replies: 1
- Views: 12717
More Text Colors!
Can we please get a greater color selection for text (similar to line colors)?
16 is much too limited.
16 is much too limited.
- 10 Apr 2024, 18:37
- Forum: DipTrace PCB Layout
- Topic: Ignore Net Check Errors on Unused Components?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10098
Re: Ignore Net Check Errors on Unused Components?
Yes, thank you for sharing your opinion. Everyone has their thoughts about what is proper and what would be confusing, so it's useful to hear from everyone. Maybe in this case, there is a more-reasonable workaround? We have components, with multiple physical parts, not all of which will be used by e...
- 01 Apr 2024, 19:44
- Forum: DipTrace PCB Layout
- Topic: Ignore Net Check Errors on Unused Components?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10098
Re: Ignore Net Check Errors on Unused Components?
> If you had a board that magically deleted components that weren't already placed then I don't see how you could add new components later. Not magically deleted - I don't want to delete them, but DipTrace is currently forcing that. I would prefer the extra parts to be left on the PCB, just moved ou...
- 30 Mar 2024, 21:28
- Forum: DipTrace PCB Layout
- Topic: Ignore Net Check Errors on Unused Components?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10098
Re: Ignore Net Check Errors on Unused Components?
Thank you for that idea. This is constant issue, as some parts are not used in every PCB. For example, the RJ-45 has two resistors (for use with its 2 on-board LEDs). But if one of those isn't used, it would be best to be able to mark the unused parts so that that connection errors are not generated...
- 29 Mar 2024, 00:53
- Forum: DipTrace PCB Layout
- Topic: Ignore Net Check Errors on Unused Components?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10098
Ignore Net Check Errors on Unused Components?
How can the PCB Connectivity Check be configured to ignore unconnected parts that are OUTSIDE the board outline? I use Hierarchical Sheets in the Schematic, which pulls in extra parts. For example, an 8-connection sheet is duplicated 3 times, but only 20 connections are required by the design. So yo...
- 07 Apr 2023, 00:32
- Forum: Basic Schematic and PCB Design
- Topic: DipTrace Team has the question to our users
- Replies: 146
- Views: 2672096
Re: DipTrace Team has the question to our users
Microcontroller variants are sometimes available, and sometimes not. For example, the MSP430FR23xx is missing, while most other variants are in the standard library. By the time we notice something is missing, though, we already need to create a component/pattern for it. So there is little reason to...