Are 0805 Inductor Footprints Not Standardized?

[JoyceDBeardsley]

Hello,

I’ve noticed that 0805 inductor footprints often vary in size compared to standard 0805 passive components.

Is there a specific reason for this difference, such as current rating, magnetic fields, or manufacturing tolerances?

Why aren’t all 0805 inductor footprints standardized the same way as resistors or capacitors?

Thank you so much!

[Serg]

Thank you for the report. We will review the dimensions and make changes if necessary.

[takoankosi]

Hello, Baseball Bros IO

I’ve noticed that 0805 inductor footprints often vary in size compared to standard 0805 passive components.

Is there a specific reason for this difference, such as current rating, magnetic fields, or manufacturing tolerances?

Why aren’t all 0805 inductor footprints standardized the same way as resistors or capacitors?

Thank you so much!

Is there a specific reason for this difference, such as current rating, magnetic fields, or manufacturing tolerances?

[Serg]

Hello, Baseball Bros IO

I’ve noticed that 0805 inductor footprints often vary in size compared to standard 0805 passive components.

Is there a specific reason for this difference, such as current rating, magnetic fields, or manufacturing tolerances?

Why aren’t all 0805 inductor footprints standardized the same way as resistors or capacitors?

Thank you so much!

Is there a specific reason for this difference, such as current rating, magnetic fields, or manufacturing tolerances?

Manufacturing tolerances in datasheets from different manufacturers are a determining factor.